CURRENT POLITICS - Equality
SPEAKERS NOTES from Forum on Equality, 10 June 2014
Uni Pub, Canberra, sponsored by the Labour History Society and the Fabian Society.
‘Laws and government may be considered … in every case as a combination of the rich to oppress the poor, and preserve to themselves the inequality of goods.’
The global corporates control the means of production
The rest of us have to sell our human capacities to them.
That is the fundamental inequality under the rule of capital.
Orwell – democracy is not a bourgeois fraud but bourgeois democracy is.
Talk of equality before the law is not social equality.
One vote one value and one person one vote is not social equality.
Mass murdoch has more clout than any elector and more than any member of pariament.
Yet he traded his right to vote here for tv networks in the u.s, of a.
Blackrock, a u.s. investment house bought up 11 percent of the shares in the 123 biggest companies here as measured by revenues.
Never went near the foreign investment review board let alone through parliament, or raised in any of the last three election campaigns.
Instead, bullying intensifies exploitation.
Housing, transport, employment, health and education.
They interlock eg bad housing impacts on health and education.
The fantasy of the very fast train – never going to happen.
Q.: who would profit from the outlay of $110 billion?
A. Merchant bankers and global corporates under ppps.
Q. Who will benefit among the travelling public?
a. The already priviledged who rarely pay for their own tickets.
Q. Who will lose out?
a. The people who now rely on buses and trains to get around the south-east corner.
Q. Who are they?
a. Women and children, the elderly and the indigenous.
often on concessional fares – will they be available on the vft?
Spend $110bn on the vft and what will be left to upgrade services for the rest of us?
One: equal outcomes not equality of opportunity;
Two: social equality not equal before an unequal system;
That is the line that hanson ran about privileges for aborigines;
Three: is a policy more or less likely to advance social equality across the generations.
The panel included the ALP’S shadowy assistant treasurer, and member for Canberra, Professor Andrew Leigh. The Coalition got mileage out of quoting Leigh’s ‘academic’ arguments for its budget. When he was promoting himself on ABC RN’s Life Matters’ he sounded like a spokesperson for the corporate’s think-tank, the Center for Independent (sic) Studies. To give some measure of how far the ALP – the anti-labour party - has moved from ‘labour values’, I distributed synopses from Leigh’s learned articles.
Employment Effects of Minimum Wages: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment
ANDREW LEIGH John F. Kennedy School of Government Harvard University
Abstract To estimate the impact of raising the minimum wage on employment, this article uses a natural experiment, arising from six increases in the Western Australian statutory minimum wage during the period 1994–2001. Relative to the rest of Australia, the employment to population ratio in Western Australia fell following each of the six rises, twice by a statistically significant margin. Aggregating the increases, the elasticity of labour demand with respect to the Western Australian statutory minimum wage is found to be –0.13.
Employment Effects of Minimum Wages: Evidence from a Quasi- Experiment—Erratum
ANDREW LEIGH John F. Kennedy School of Government Harvard University
In an article published in the December 2003 edition of the Australian Economic Review (Leigh 2003), the author mistakenly used data for labour force to population ratios in place of the theoretical model requirement of data on employment to population ratios. Changes in the Western Australian minimum wage could have impacted employment on three margins, and this error meant that the analysis allowed for an effect on only two of these margins. To the extent that increases in the Western Australian minimum wage caused workers to become unemployed, or to shift from full-time to part-time employment, this ought not to have affected the empirical findings. But if increases in the Western Australian minimum wage caused workers to leave the labour force altogether, this would not have shown up in the figures presented. In addition, the original article presented ‘implied elasticities’, which were based on percentage point effects. Since elasticities should, strictly speaking, be percentage effects, the results are re-presented both as percentage point and percentage effects. The full dataset and Stata do-file are available from the author … but the employment effect of increasing the minimum wage is estimated to be somewhat larger than was reported in the original version. The author sincerely apologises for this error.
But not for giving comfort to the enemies of a minimum wage?
Being caught out did nothing to stop his repeating the anti-worker line.
Minimum Wages and Employment: Comment
Ian Watson, Australian Centre for Industrial Relations Research and Training The University of Sydney
Abstract Does increasing the minimum wage lead to employment losses? For many years most economists thought that the answer to this was a straightforward ‘yes’. However, research during the 1990s began to overturn this conventional wisdom and showed that increases in the minimum wage did not automatically lead to employment losses. A recent Australian study, by Leigh (2003), examined the impact of statutory minimum wages in Western Australia and reached conclusions which supported the conventional view. However, close scrutiny of Leigh’s article shows that it is fundamentally flawed. Despite Leigh’s efforts, it remains the case that we simply do not know a great deal about the employment impact of Australia’s system of minimum wages.
Minimum Wages and Employment: Reply
ANDREW LEIGH, John F. Kennedy School of Government Harvard University
Abstract The results of my study (Leigh 2003, 2004) on the effect of minimum wages on employment have been brought into question by Watson (2004), which raises some potential methodological concerns. Careful reanalysis of the Western Australian minimum wage experiment demonstrates that this critique is not well founded. Further checks show that the results are robust to a number of alternative specifications, in addition to those presented in the original article.
Does Raising the Minimum Wage Help the Poor?
ANDREW LEIGH lSocial Policy Evaluation, Analysis and Research Centre, Research School of Social Sciences, ANU.
What is the impact of raising the minimum wage on family incomes? Using data from the 1994–1995 to 2002–2003 Survey of Income and Housing, the characteristics of low-wage workers are analysed. Those who earn near-minimum wages are disproportionately female, unmarried and young, without post-school qualifications and overseas born. About one-third of near-minimum-wage workers are the sole worker in their household. Due to low labour force participation rates in the poorest households, minimum-wage workers are most likely to be in middle-income households. Under plausible parameters for the effect of minimum wages on hourly wages and employment, it appears unlikely that raising the minimum wage will significantly lower family income inequality.
Leigh got pre-selection when the so-called Left split in 2010. Given the voting patterns of the ACT, he knew he had to be in the ALP to get into parliament. Had he returned to a job in any other city he could have chased selection for the other free-market party.
A republican to his cufflinks
Andrew Leigh, ALP MHR for Fraser: ‘In 2012, when Prince Charles and the Duchess of Cornwall visited Canberra, I was pleased to welcome them on the tarmac of Canberra airport, wearing my Australian Republican Movement cufflinks’.
How brave is that.
 Adam Smith, Lectures on Jurisprudence, The Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1978, p. 208.